My Offseason: A Proposal

I was hoping to post a detailed offseason preview this week looking at all free-agent options and potential trade targets. But, I don’t have time for that and the Grizzlies are unlikely to be super-aggressive this summer altering a roster that’s already been radically changed. So, instead, I’ll go on the record with what I think would be the best path for the Grizzlies to take in the coming months. Hey, Chris Wallace, Michael Heisley, Tony Barone, and Marc Iavaroni: If you’re reading, here’s the blueprint:

For starters, I would enter this offseason guided by five principles/goals:

1. This team has eight key players under the age of 24, perhaps second only the Portland. I don’t want to add any more players quite that young.

2. I want to save a significant amount of this year’s cap space in order to maximize cap space next summer when Antoine Walker’s $9.3 million contract and most of Greg Buckner’s money comes off the books.

3. Discounting Buckner, all five guards on the current roster are ball-handlers. I’d like to jettison one or two of these players and replace them with perimeter players whose strengths lie in other areas — namely defense and/or shooting.

4. I’d like to add a somewhat experienced frontcourt player who is a rebounder/enforcer, possibly someone who could start at power forward.

5. Ultimately, I want to add a couple of young veteran contributors who can ease the burden on the team’s rookies and second-year players but still potentially be a part of the long-range plan. I also want to add an older veteran or two on a one-year contract to add some experience to the locker room.

With these five principles as my guide, here’s the kind of offseason I’d like to see the Grizzlies have:

Step One: Trade for a frontcourt player.

Disliking the realistic options in free agency, I’d pursue my frontcourt addition via trade. Using some combination of Kyle Lowry, Javaris Crittenton, and Hakim Warrick as trade bait, I’d try to acquire a rebounding power forward who could potentially start while Darrell Arthur gets used to the NBA game or until a better option presents itself via the draft, trade, or free agency next summer.

My preferred target: Anderson Varejao.
My offer: Lowry (or Crittenton) and Warrick for Varejao


Anderson Varejao: A young banger with playoff experience.

The Grizzlies were interested in Varejao last off-season as a restricted free agent, but ultimately decided not to sign an offer sheet based on the assumption that the Cavaliers would match. The Cavs played hardball with Varejao and he held out half the year. The result was his least effective season, but he still had an excellent rebound rate and is still the same player he was before: A 6’10”, 240-pounder who is a high-level rebounder and energy guy who can ably defend the best post players. He’s a vet with playoff experience but is still only 25 years old.

Why does Cleveland do this deal? Well, the relationship between Varejao and the team is apparently strained and he is reportedly on the block. Warrick would be an offensive upgrade at power forward for a team that needs scoring options other than Lebron James. Lowry would significantly upgrade the Cav’s defense at the point. The Cavs have four players on the roster who can play the point, but the situation isn’t nearly as crowded as it seems: Eric Snow and Damon Jones are on the last year’s on their deals and are past the point of being reliable contributors. Daniel Gibson is essentially a spot-up shooter. Delonte West is a combo guard who will see a lot of time at the two. So, I think Lowry would play a significant role for the Cavs. Additionally, the Cavs would save $2.5 in salary, or $5 million in real dollars since Cleveland is significantly over the luxury tax. Maybe Cleveland could get better offers, but this would be a good one.

Back-up plans: David Lee of the Knicks, potentially for the same package (though I suspect the Knicks would want Conley) … Josh Boone of the Nets (A promising banger who played with Rudy Gay at UCONN. New Jersey’s frontcourt is overloaded. I’d offer Lowry or Crittenton for Boone and a future second-rounder.) … Minnesota’s Craig Smith (the best affordable free-agent target) … Denver’s Linus Kleiza (for Lowry, though I’m told Denver wouldn’t do this) … Ronny Turiaf could be a free-agent option, but I don’t seen outbidding the Lakers for a reasonable price.

Step Two: Sign a rotation-quality perimeter player.

Here, I’d look for someone who is 24-27 years old, can play the two and three, and can defend and hit a three. And also be had for under the mid-level. This is difficult since, for lower-level free agents, the Grizzlies cap room isn’t much of a competitive advantage. Being well under the luxury tax may be, however.

My preferred target: Kelenna Azubuike
My offer: Azubuike made less than $700,000 last year, so I’m not sure how much he’s going to command on the open market. I’d offer him slightly above market value on a two- or three-year deal and use my cap space to frontload the deal, thus preserving more cap space next summer. Something like a three-year, $7-8 million deal, with descending yearly salaries.


Kelenna Azubuike: Low-cost free agent sleeper?

Azubuike may be the only player out there who fits all of my criteria. A former D-league vet who found a home in Golden State, Azubuike is 24 years old, a solid 6’5”, 220 pounds, and an excellent athlete. He’s a career 38% three-point shooter. His weakness is his ball handling and ability to create off the dribble, but that’s fine because we’re only looking for catch-and-shoot/catch-and-finish types anyway. He’s a little small for the three, but strong enough to pull it off and should continue to evolve into a strong defender.

Other potential targets: Azubuike’s Golden State teammate, Mickael Pietrus (26), would be an even better bet to fill all those roles, but I suspect he’d be asking for more money than I’d want to spend. … Kareem Rush (27) could be beaten out of a job in Indiana by his little brother Brandon. He’s a career 36-percent three-point shooter with good size. Wouldn’t pay much more than the minimum, with only one year guaranteed. … Marc Iavaroni coached James Jones(27) in Phoenix. The 6’8” small forward can’t defend or player multiple positions, but he would add a needed back-up small forward and is an excellent three-point shooter(40% on his career, 44% last season). For a couple of years, front-loaded, for reasonable money, would be worth a look. … Quinton Ross (27) doesn’t have much of an offensive game, but is a quality defender and also, apparently, Darrell Arthur’s cousin. … I wouldn’t pay much more than the minimum for Denver’s Yakouba Diawara (25), but he’s a 6’7” swingman with good defensive skills and an improving three-point shot. Could be worth a flyer. … With J.R. Giddens and Bill Walker acquired on draft-day, the Celtics may let Tony Allen (26) walk. I’d consider him, but I’m not crazy about him … Maurice Evans (29) is a little older than I’d like for a multi-year deal, but he’s physical, can hit a three, and could be getting pushed out of Orlando by Courtney Lee. Worth a look.

Step Three: Fill out the roster with a couple of veterans on one-year, minimum contracts.

A lot of vets looking for minimum deals want to latch onto contenders, not young, rebuilding teams. So, the Grizzlies might want to look at guys really nearing the end or with local/regional ties who would understand their roles and provide guidance to the kids.

Possible frontcourt targets: Lorenzen Wright (Looks about done even though he’s just 32. But, he cares about the city and, presumably, the franchise, probably has a relationship of some sort with Marc Gasol, and would probably like to finish his career in Memphis. I’m no huge Wright fan or Tiger homer, but I don’t think bringing him back for one year on the vet’s minimum would be such a bad thing.) … Adonal Foyle (physical presence and A+ personality. Maybe worth more than the minimum for one year) … Jake Voskuhl (Eric Hasseltine look-a-like spent time in Phoenix with Iavaroni) … Devean George (liable to get better offers) … Michael Doleac (size and shooting at the end of the bench).

Possible backcourt targets: Lindsey Hunter (at 37, could finally be done in Detroit. Jackson State grad could end his career close to home) … Damon Stoudamire (would he want to come back and ride the bench this time for the minimum? Does he owe it to Heisley for his final payday and giving him a shot with the Spurs last season?) … Kevin Ollie (at 35, can he still survive in brief bursts?)

Possible final roster:

PG: Mike Conley/Javaris Crittenton/Lindsey Hunter
SG: O.J. Mayo/Kelenna Azubuike/Greg Buckner
SF: Rudy Gay/Marko Jaric
PF: Anderson Varejao/Darrell Arthur/Antoine Walker
C: Darko Milicic/Marc Gasol/Lorenzen Wright

Varejao has a player option for $6.2 million next season, which is a pretty reasonable number. If he takes it, that’s only $1.2 million more than Lowry and Warrick would be owed. If Azubuike’s second-year salary is around $3 million (or less), the team has only added around $4 to next year’s cap. The Grizzlies would still possibly have eight-figure cap room in ’09. If Varejao opted out and didn’t resign, so be it: Even more cap room to secure a replacement.

The upshot is that you've added a couple of young veterans with defensive ability and playoff experience to ease the pressure on the rookies and second-year players. This would go a long way toward helping next year's team be competitive without derailing the long-range plan.

Submitted by Chris Herrington on Tue, 07/01/2008 - 8:02pm.
Chris Herrington's blog | add new comment | email this blog

I was thinkin about Lowery and Warrick for Varejao before I read this. Great minds think alike. You have great ideas. If Varejao opts Arthur would have a yr under his belt and could maybe start.

byron (not verified) | Sat, 07/12/2008 - 4:51am

PG: Mike Conley/O.J. Mayo/Marc Jaric
SG: Corey Maggette/Greg Buckner/Mickael Pietrus
SF: Rudy Gay/J.R. Smith
PF: Darrell Arthur/Antoine Walker/Hakim Warrick
C: Darko Milicic/Marc Gasol/Jamall Magloire

breeze30 (not verified) | Sat, 07/05/2008 - 5:41pm

a few points on this:

1. Warrick isn't really a post scorer. He's an increasingly effective mid-range shooter and he get catch-and-finish baskets. I think Marc Gasol will be almost as effective a scoring option as Warrick and a much better passer, so I think he'll bring more offensive value. he can score a little bit on the block as well as playing pick-and-pop from 18 feet or so.

2. Warrick's defensive and rebounding problems relative to someone like Varejao offset the offensive advantages, in my mind.

3. With or without that trade, neither player is the power forward of the future. That's either Darrell Arthur or a future acquisition to be determined. Varejao, however, can play two positions. So, if you keep him, he could eventually back up both frontcourt spots, freeing you to use, say, Darko's salary spot somewhere else.

4. I agree that Varejao and Darko aren't a great pairing. I think in that case, you'd arrange your rotation to have Varejao and Gasol (much more complementary) together and maybe Darko and Arthur (ditto)

Chris Herrington | Thu, 07/03/2008 - 7:15pm

I'm scared of trading Hak for Varejao because there wouldn't be one proven scorer in the front court between Darko, Gasol, Arthur and Varejao. The worry already is that our team is too perimeter oriented. While Hak is not many things, he's at least proven he can provide a little inside scoring option. Maybe Gasol is better on offense than I've been led to believe and he can pick up some of the frontcourt scoring slack. Regardless, the idea of Varejao and Darko on the court at the same time scares me.

Chris Avis (not verified) | Thu, 07/03/2008 - 6:44pm

Burke? Fizer? Fortson?

What is this, 2004?

(And, re: Fortson -- who are you, Mike Fratello?)

Chris Herrington | Thu, 07/03/2008 - 4:08am

Pat Burke

Josh Boone (time to bring some cornrows back!

Paul Shirley (if we're gonna lose, let's at least have a good laugh about it)

Danny Fortson

Marcus Fizer

Joey Dorsey (sorry for the homer pick, but he's as good for laughs as Paul Shirley)

CWIM (not verified) | Wed, 07/02/2008 - 4:02pm

I'd prefer to start Arthur and look for a young banger to bring off the bench for several reasons:

1) Arthur brings a solid offensive potential to the PF spot, which will help distribute the scoring and make us harder to defend 2) He has a good bond with OJ and I think they will work well together on the first team 3) It will be easier to find a young, inexpensive PF for a shorter-term committment, and hopefully he will be worth keeping long-term.

Best PF prospects: 1) Craig Smith--Minnesota really needs another PG. We should've included Kyle Lowry and gotten Smith back in the Mayo deal. 2) Brandon Bass--Dallas needs someone to back up Jason Kidd. 3) Ronny Turiaf--although I agree LA will not let him go cheaply.

Herschel (not verified) | Wed, 07/02/2008 - 3:53pm

I know the consensus is that Marc Iavaroni isn't being given a fair shake. It seems like Heisley has been throwing him under the bus lately. Now, I don't think it is right to publicly embarass the guy, but I also don't think he is a very good coach.

I realize last year was his first year as a head coach, and he had some difficult things to deal with through out the course of the season. That being said, I didn't see anything to make me think this is the right guy for this young and talented squad. He made one bad decision after the next last year. Now, maybe he will one day be a good NBA head coach, but he isn't right now. And I don't think a team this young can wait around for him to become one.

Honestly, I think he is the new Sidney Lowe. A really nice guy who tries hard, but doesn't have the experience or expertise to coach an NBA team. And, coincidentally, the kind of coach this team desperately needs right now is a Hubie Brown type coach. A teacher with a firm, disciplined coaching style. Someone who knows that set rotations are extremely important to all NBA players, but especially for young players and rookies. A coach with an actual style and gameplan in place. I have yet to see any of these things from Iavaroni. And I doubt I ever will.

Adam (not verified) | Wed, 07/02/2008 - 2:41pm

JimmyJim, that was cruel. But it did make me laugh, I am ashamed to say.

I think a lot of the moves Chris proposed would be a pretty good idea. However, I would caution against making too many additions. I know this young team is going to struggle, but I don't see a couple of mid-level veterans doing a lot to change that.

To be honest, what usually makes young guys better, faster is getting tons of playing time. Even on a bad team. The reason Pau became so good so fast is because Sidney Lowe played him non-stop his rookie season. The team had a terrible record at the end of that year, but they also had a rookie player who had some real experience and confidence.

The worst thing for a young and talented player is making them play inconsistent minutes coming off the bench. The truth is that we are very likely going to be a bad team again next year. So, use this next season as effectively as you can, by having your young core of best players out on the floor as much as possible. I guarantee they will be much better players in a year's time, if they are allowed to learn on the job this year. And at that point, you can look at adding a couple of pieces to the puzzle through free-agency and trades.

Adam (not verified) | Wed, 07/02/2008 - 2:17pm

Just playing devil's advocate on the trade, since any trade idea that starts Lowry or Critt for (insert good rebounding PF here) will illicit an automatic "YES! Do it Yesterday" from the Griz fanbase without thinking if the other team has a mutual benefit from the trade.

LeBron is their main ball handler. Thus, they require (or should) their PG to be a solid 3 point shooter who can play well off the ball.

That is why Gibson and Delonte West fit the mold of the PG they need beside LeBron. Someone who can nail the open 3 when teams double LeBron.

Can Lowry or Critt do that? It would be like in the finals where Kobe played 20 feet off of Rondo.

Heck, the same can go for Miami with Dwade and LA with Kobe. Their point guards need to be efficient 3 point shooters since Dwade and Kobe are the defacto primary ball handlers and the point guards play off the ball so much.

And getting rid of Hak in the Cleveland deal also takes away our best PF/C scoring threat. If Marc and Arthur take some time to be effective NBA scorers (reasonable), then a combo of Sideshow Bob and Darko would be disastrous.

Regarding NY, I also suspect they would want Conley out of our guard-trio, but even then I have a feeling neither of the three may be what they want for the very same reason above, shooting. D'Antoni requires shooting (which is why Rondo is in Boston right now and not Phoenix).

One of the possible PG/PF swap that may benefit both teams involved would be Lowry for CharlieV. Skiles has proven he will play PG's that can't shoot (duhon and hinrich) and loves defensive intensity (which is why CharlieV is on the block).

Anonymous (not verified) | Wed, 07/02/2008 - 1:30am

Chris steals my thunder again!

I was thinking the same thing, particularly maybe going after some veterans with playoff and/or championship experience. Wouldn't mind paying/seeing Posey back in Beale St. Blue . . . playing defense, bringing championship savvy. He might even come, if we pay him . . .

Elton Brand's on the market. . . .

But the bottom line: I'm all for developing youth, but we do need vets to show how to win. Otherwise, we'll just end up with lots of experience at losing. NOT where we wanna go.

L3E (not verified) | Tue, 07/01/2008 - 9:46pm

JimmyJim's got jokes!

Chris Herrington | Tue, 07/01/2008 - 9:35pm

Why don't we just go balls out and try to trade for Dorsey,Dougals-Roberts, Shawne Williams and Carney. It'd be awesome. Also, we could get Darius Washington, Jr. to run the point. The hardest part about that would be where to find Darius. Greece, Czech Republic, Mr. Pride?

JimmyJim (not verified) | Tue, 07/01/2008 - 9:22pm

Azubuike would be the perfect fit for the Grizz. I've been on him for a very long time. Hes a cheaper, and perhaps better fit than pietrus, whose name seems to be thrown around alot more, both on local blogs and nationally.

I hadnt thought about varajeo before, but that is intriguing. I wouldnt do that trade if I was the cavs. I think craig smith is more gettable.

Dont you feel that everyone is making a little too much out of the need to move conley? I think that mayo will be just fine at 2. Just because he can dribble doesnt mean he has to play point. He defends and shot from outside at a high rate in college. He played the 2 in college, and without a real pick and roll compliment to conley (other than, perhaps, arthur), I bet mayo will have ample time to have the ball in his hands and finish plays in what will probably be a drive and kick offense again.

If conley figures it out on the defensive end, and we can play him with a 2 guard that can actually defend, then I'm very high on the prospect of keeping them both.

Matt (not verified) | Tue, 07/01/2008 - 9:19pm

I wanted to use my trade chips on a power player with some experience, then focus free-agency for a wing player.

A power forward who can board is much more important than a back-up for Rudy Gay, so that's where I'd focus my best movable assets.

Also, not interested in bringing a dude who harbors murder suspects back to Memphis.

Chris Herrington | Tue, 07/01/2008 - 8:38pm

And no mention of trading a lot of nothing to Indiana for Shawne Williams, who has the size to play small forward and power forward. Shawne may be a risk, but he could be a contributor and an alright shooter.

Latilleon (not verified) | Tue, 07/01/2008 - 8:33pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Apple Store

Browse archives

« August 2008  
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

Recent comments

Navigation

User login